If you're at Linktree and any claim is wrong, this is where to flag it.
The strategy is built on 49 verbatim reviews, 10 LLM responses, and live homepage and pricing capture — all dated 30 April 2026. The full research record is browsable on the research page.
If something is materially wrong — a quote misattributed, a count that doesn't trace, a positioning read Linktree disagrees with — reply by email and it gets corrected.
Reply by email.
Direct, named, no form. Dropped into the audit's source record within one business day.
The verbatim claim — copied from the strategy page, the research page, or one of the PDF deliverables.
What is wrong about it — a material fact, an outdated number, a misattributed quote, a positioning read Linktree disputes, etc. Specifics over feelings.
What it should say instead — with a source I can cite. (Press release URL, Linktree product page, support documentation, etc.)
Your role at Linktree — for the correction log. ("Comms team," "Engineering manager," "CEO" — first name is fine.)
What happens next
Within 24 hours — I acknowledge receipt and confirm I'll act on the flag (or ask follow-up questions if the claim isn't yet specific enough to act on).
Within 48 hours of acknowledgement — the strategy and research pages are updated, and a dated correction note is appended to this page.
If the correction is material — the v3 strategy is rolled forward to v3.1 (or higher) with a public changelog. The Tier 1 source record is updated. Anyone who downloaded the earlier PDF gets the updated link via the same email address.
If the correction reveals a gap in the Quality Gate itself — the gate is amended and the change is logged in SecondBrain/business/rational-magic-docs/quality-gate-defamation-and-evidence.md. This has already happened once on 30 April 2026 (lawyer review and PI insurance moved from "hard gate" to "external recommendation").
What's welcome
A different read on the Hidden Enemy or Shadow Side — those are interpretive, and a counter-read from Linktree lands here on the record verbatim.
Evidence we missed — funding, valuation, employee count, product launches, anchor-tenant relationships. Send the source and it goes into the next mining cycle.
Replies log. No replies received as of publication. Corrections will be logged here with date, responder role, claim flagged, and correction made.