[ { "task": "bio", "model": "chatgpt", "condition": "with", "model_id": "chatgpt", "created": "", "judge_response": { "cell": "bio-chatgpt-with", "task": "bio", "model": "chatgpt", "condition": "with", "banned_vocab_score": 2, "banned_vocab_hits": [], "judge_model": "anthropic/claude-sonnet-4.6", "judge_scores": { "voice_match": 1, "strategic_frame": 1, "specificity": 1, "factual_safety": 2, "note": "Option 2 lands the brand line correctly but all three options are scored together as one submission; collectively they are partially specific (Brand OS named, 3-day present, but no price, no Melbourne, no proof differentiator) and the voice is competent but not distinctively sharp or witty across any of the three." }, "total": 7 } }, { "task": "bio", "model": "chatgpt", "condition": "without", "model_id": "chatgpt", "created": "", "judge_response": { "cell": "bio-chatgpt-without", "task": "bio", "model": "chatgpt", "condition": "without", "banned_vocab_score": 1, "banned_vocab_hits": [ "—" ], "judge_model": "anthropic/claude-sonnet-4.6", "judge_scores": { "voice_match": 0, "strategic_frame": 0, "specificity": 0, "factual_safety": 1, "note": "All three options use banned vocabulary and constructs (transform, empower-adjacent phrasing, em dashes, vague outcomes like 'sustainable growth' and 'products people love'), carry zero positioning from the spec, and read like generic agency copy rather than the sharp, evidence-grounded voice required." }, "total": 2 } }, { "task": "bio", "model": "claude", "condition": "with", "model_id": "claude", "created": "", "judge_response": { "cell": "bio-claude-with", "task": "bio", "model": "claude", "condition": "with", "banned_vocab_score": 2, "banned_vocab_hits": [], "judge_model": "anthropic/claude-sonnet-4.6", "judge_scores": { "voice_match": 1, "strategic_frame": 1, "specificity": 2, "factual_safety": 2, "note": "Option 3 is the strongest and correctly recommended; all three options are factually safe and specific, but none carries the enemy/antidote logic or brand line with enough force for full strategic credit, and the voice is competent but flat, missing the witty sharpness the spec demands." }, "total": 8 } }, { "task": "bio", "model": "claude", "condition": "without", "model_id": "claude", "created": "", "judge_response": { "cell": "bio-claude-without", "task": "bio", "model": "claude", "condition": "without", "banned_vocab_score": 2, "banned_vocab_hits": [], "judge_model": "anthropic/claude-sonnet-4.6", "judge_scores": { "voice_match": 0, "strategic_frame": 0, "specificity": 0, "factual_safety": 1, "note": "All five options ignore the actual brand identity entirely, importing mystical, philosophical, or community-publication framing that contradicts the specification's positioning as a one-person, evidence-backed brand strategy sprint; forbidden words and phrases appear throughout ('transform' implied, 'impact', 'alchemy', 'empower'-adjacent constructions), and the writer's closing question confirms they did not read or apply the brief." }, "total": 3 } }, { "task": "bio", "model": "gemini", "condition": "with", "model_id": "gemini", "created": "", "judge_response": { "cell": "bio-gemini-with", "task": "bio", "model": "gemini", "condition": "with", "banned_vocab_score": 2, "banned_vocab_hits": [], "judge_model": "anthropic/claude-sonnet-4.6", "judge_scores": { "voice_match": 2, "strategic_frame": 2, "specificity": 1, "factual_safety": 2, "note": "Opens with the brand line and lands the core differentiators cleanly, but omits price and the proof element, leaving specificity partial; also exceeds 160 characters at approximately 162." }, "total": 9 } }, { "task": "bio", "model": "gemini", "condition": "without", "model_id": "gemini", "created": "", "judge_response": { "cell": "bio-gemini-without", "task": "bio", "model": "gemini", "condition": "without", "banned_vocab_score": 2, "banned_vocab_hits": [], "judge_model": "anthropic/claude-sonnet-4.6", "judge_scores": { "voice_match": 0, "strategic_frame": 0, "specificity": 0, "factual_safety": 0, "note": "This copy is entirely unrelated to Rational Magic; it describes a fantasy tabletop roleplaying game and shares no content, voice, strategy, or facts with the brand specification." }, "total": 2 } }, { "task": "changelog", "model": "chatgpt", "condition": "with", "model_id": "chatgpt", "created": "", "judge_response": { "cell": "changelog-chatgpt-with", "task": "changelog", "model": "chatgpt", "condition": "with", "banned_vocab_score": 2, "banned_vocab_hits": [], "judge_model": "anthropic/claude-sonnet-4.6", "judge_scores": { "voice_match": 2, "strategic_frame": 2, "specificity": 2, "factual_safety": 2, "note": "Clean, composed changelog that names every artefact accurately, closes on the antidote logic ('decided strategy, loaded where the words are made'), and breaks no vocabulary or mechanical rules." }, "total": 10 } }, { "task": "changelog", "model": "chatgpt", "condition": "without", "model_id": "chatgpt", "created": "", "judge_response": { "cell": "changelog-chatgpt-without", "task": "changelog", "model": "chatgpt", "condition": "without", "banned_vocab_score": 2, "banned_vocab_hits": [], "judge_model": "anthropic/claude-sonnet-4.6", "judge_scores": { "voice_match": 1, "specificity": 1, "strategic_frame": 0, "factual_safety": 2, "note": "Safe and competent but reads like generic product release notes; no trait lands clearly, no enemy or differentiator logic surfaces, and qualifiers like 'cleaner' and 'streamlined' are the soft filler the spec explicitly fights against." }, "total": 6 } }, { "task": "changelog", "model": "claude", "condition": "with", "model_id": "claude", "created": "", "judge_response": { "cell": "changelog-claude-with", "task": "changelog", "model": "claude", "condition": "with", "banned_vocab_score": 2, "banned_vocab_hits": [], "judge_model": "anthropic/claude-sonnet-4.6", "judge_scores": { "voice_match": 2, "strategic_frame": 1, "specificity": 2, "factual_safety": 2, "note": "Voice is sharp and composed throughout with no banned words or mechanics violations; strategic frame is present via differentiators and proof emphasis but the enemy/antidote logic is absent, which is acceptable given the changelog format yet limits the score to 1." }, "total": 9 } }, { "task": "changelog", "model": "claude", "condition": "without", "model_id": "claude", "created": "", "judge_response": { "cell": "changelog-claude-without", "task": "changelog", "model": "claude", "condition": "without", "banned_vocab_score": 1, "banned_vocab_hits": [ "—" ], "judge_model": "anthropic/claude-sonnet-4.6", "judge_scores": { "voice_match": 1, "strategic_frame": 1, "specificity": 1, "factual_safety": 2, "note": "Banned phrase 'we've' aside, the copy leans on generic filler ('less guesswork, more signal', 'hold up under scrutiny') and misses the sharp named differentiators (evidence-backed methodology, USD $1,500, three business days, async, human-reviewed) that the spec requires for a credible changelog entry." }, "total": 6 } }, { "task": "changelog", "model": "gemini", "condition": "with", "model_id": "gemini", "created": "", "judge_response": { "cell": "changelog-gemini-with", "task": "changelog", "model": "gemini", "condition": "with", "banned_vocab_score": 2, "banned_vocab_hits": [], "judge_model": "anthropic/claude-sonnet-4.6", "judge_scores": { "voice_match": 1, "strategic_frame": 2, "specificity": 1, "factual_safety": 2, "note": "The enemy/antidote framing lands cleanly and the voice is mostly on-spec, but the copy is incomplete mid-sentence, preventing full assessment of specificity (named artefacts, price, turnaround are absent or cut off)." }, "total": 8 } }, { "task": "changelog", "model": "gemini", "condition": "without", "model_id": "gemini", "created": "", "judge_response": { "cell": "changelog-gemini-without", "task": "changelog", "model": "gemini", "condition": "without", "banned_vocab_score": 1, "banned_vocab_hits": [ "powerful" ], "judge_model": "anthropic/claude-sonnet-4.6", "judge_scores": { "voice_match": 0, "strategic_frame": 0, "specificity": 0, "factual_safety": 1, "note": "The copy is incomplete (cuts off mid-bullet), opens with banned enthusiasm register ('excited to announce'), uses forbidden word 'powerful', and carries none of the brand's positioning, traits, or named differentiators." }, "total": 2 } }, { "task": "cold-email", "model": "chatgpt", "condition": "with", "model_id": "chatgpt", "created": "", "judge_response": { "cell": "cold-email-chatgpt-with", "task": "cold-email", "model": "chatgpt", "condition": "with", "banned_vocab_score": 2, "banned_vocab_hits": [], "judge_model": "anthropic/claude-sonnet-4.6", "judge_scores": { "voice_match": 2, "strategic_frame": 2, "specificity": 2, "factual_safety": 2, "note": "Clean execution: the enemy (competent sameness) is named without the label, differentiators land in correct order, vocabulary rules are observed, and the CTA is specific and low-friction without inventing any claims." }, "total": 10 } }, { "task": "cold-email", "model": "chatgpt", "condition": "without", "model_id": "chatgpt", "created": "", "judge_response": { "cell": "cold-email-chatgpt-without", "task": "cold-email", "model": "chatgpt", "condition": "without", "banned_vocab_score": 0, "banned_vocab_hits": [ "—", "—", "—" ], "judge_model": "anthropic/claude-sonnet-4.6", "judge_scores": { "voice_match": 1, "specificity": 0, "strategic_frame": 0, "factual_safety": 2, "note": "The email is inoffensive and safe but reads as generic agency outreach; it carries none of the brand's positioning (evidence-backed methodology, Brand OS, the enemy of Competent Sameness, price, turnaround), uses the banned phrase 'no hard pitch' energy without the spec's sharpness, and the offer of free rewrites contradicts the product's actual offer entirely." }, "total": 3 } }, { "task": "cold-email", "model": "claude", "condition": "with", "model_id": "claude", "created": "", "judge_response": { "cell": "cold-email-claude-with", "task": "cold-email", "model": "claude", "condition": "with", "banned_vocab_score": 2, "banned_vocab_hits": [], "judge_model": "anthropic/claude-sonnet-4.6", "judge_scores": { "voice_match": 2, "strategic_frame": 2, "specificity": 2, "factual_safety": 2, "note": "Clean execution: the five-tool perception hook names the enemy (Competent Sameness) without labelling it, the antidote and key artefacts land precisely, forbidden vocabulary is absent, and the offer facts match the specification throughout." }, "total": 10 } }, { "task": "cold-email", "model": "claude", "condition": "without", "model_id": "claude", "created": "", "judge_response": { "cell": "cold-email-claude-without", "task": "cold-email", "model": "claude", "condition": "without", "banned_vocab_score": 1, "banned_vocab_hits": [ "—" ], "judge_model": "anthropic/claude-sonnet-4.6", "judge_scores": { "voice_match": 0, "strategic_frame": 0, "specificity": 0, "factual_safety": 1, "note": "The copy describes a homepage rewrite and Loom audit service that does not exist in the specification; the offer, enemy framing, differentiators, vocabulary rules (em dash used, 'book a call' equivalent offered), and register are all wrong for Rational Magic." }, "total": 2 } }, { "task": "cold-email", "model": "gemini", "condition": "with", "model_id": "gemini", "created": "", "judge_response": { "cell": "cold-email-gemini-with", "task": "cold-email", "model": "gemini", "condition": "with", "banned_vocab_score": 2, "banned_vocab_hits": [], "judge_model": "anthropic/claude-sonnet-4.6", "judge_scores": { "voice_match": 2, "strategic_frame": 2, "specificity": 1, "factual_safety": 2, "note": "The enemy framing lands cleanly and the voice holds across every sentence, but the copy is cut off before any differentiators or offer specifics appear, leaving specificity only partial." }, "total": 9 } }, { "task": "cold-email", "model": "gemini", "condition": "without", "model_id": "gemini", "created": "", "judge_response": { "cell": "cold-email-gemini-without", "task": "cold-email", "model": "gemini", "condition": "without", "banned_vocab_score": 1, "banned_vocab_hits": [ "—" ], "judge_model": "anthropic/claude-sonnet-4.6", "judge_scores": { "voice_match": 0, "strategic_frame": 0, "specificity": 0, "factual_safety": 1, "note": "The copy reads as a generic conversion-copywriter pitch; it uses banned words ('fluff'), frames the offer as copywriting rather than brand strategy, invents a service description ('conversion-focused copy') that contradicts the spec, and the email is also truncated mid-sentence." }, "total": 2 } }, { "task": "delivery-email", "model": "chatgpt", "condition": "with", "model_id": "chatgpt", "created": "", "judge_response": { "cell": "delivery-email-chatgpt-with", "task": "delivery-email", "model": "chatgpt", "condition": "with", "banned_vocab_score": 2, "banned_vocab_hits": [], "judge_model": "anthropic/claude-sonnet-4.6", "judge_scores": { "voice_match": 2, "strategic_frame": 2, "specificity": 2, "factual_safety": 2, "note": "Clean delivery email that names every specified artefact, echoes the drawer/antidote logic without overreaching, and stays composed and human without tipping into folksy; no banned words, no invented claims." }, "total": 10 } }, { "task": "delivery-email", "model": "chatgpt", "condition": "without", "model_id": "chatgpt", "created": "", "judge_response": { "cell": "delivery-email-chatgpt-without", "task": "delivery-email", "model": "chatgpt", "condition": "without", "banned_vocab_score": 0, "banned_vocab_hits": [ "—", "—" ], "judge_model": "anthropic/claude-sonnet-4.6", "judge_scores": { "voice_match": 0, "strategic_frame": 0, "specificity": 0, "factual_safety": 1, "note": "The copy violates multiple hard rules simultaneously: em dashes throughout, 'our team' and 'we're excited' phrasing, 'book a call' equivalent offered, banned words like 'powerful' adjacent framing, no named artefacts from the actual offer (Brand OS, eval pack, AI perception baseline), no differentiators present, and the register is generic agency-warm rather than composed and sharp." }, "total": 1 } }, { "task": "delivery-email", "model": "claude", "condition": "with", "model_id": "claude", "created": "", "judge_response": { "cell": "delivery-email-claude-with", "task": "delivery-email", "model": "claude", "condition": "with", "banned_vocab_score": 2, "banned_vocab_hits": [], "judge_model": "anthropic/claude-sonnet-4.6", "judge_scores": { "voice_match": 2, "strategic_frame": 1, "specificity": 2, "factual_safety": 2, "note": "Voice is clean and on-spec throughout; specificity and safety are strong; strategic frame is functional but the enemy/antidote logic and key brand tension (speed is cheap, taste isn't) are absent, making this a competent delivery note rather than a positioned one." }, "total": 9 } }, { "task": "delivery-email", "model": "claude", "condition": "without", "model_id": "claude", "created": "", "judge_response": { "cell": "delivery-email-claude-without", "task": "delivery-email", "model": "claude", "condition": "without", "banned_vocab_score": 0, "banned_vocab_hits": [ "—", "—", "—", "—", "—", "—" ], "judge_model": "anthropic/claude-sonnet-4.6", "judge_scores": { "voice_match": 0, "strategic_frame": 0, "specificity": 0, "factual_safety": 1, "note": "Violates multiple hard rules simultaneously: uses 'book a call' logic with a 45-minute call CTA (the spec is async, no calls), uses 'our team' and 'we're genuinely excited', delivers generic artefact names instead of the specified Brand OS, install kit, and before/after eval pack, and the register is warm-folksy rather than composed-sharp." }, "total": 1 } }, { "task": "delivery-email", "model": "gemini", "condition": "with", "model_id": "gemini", "created": "", "judge_response": { "cell": "delivery-email-gemini-with", "task": "delivery-email", "model": "gemini", "condition": "with", "banned_vocab_score": 2, "banned_vocab_hits": [], "judge_model": "anthropic/claude-sonnet-4.6", "judge_scores": { "voice_match": 1, "strategic_frame": 1, "specificity": 1, "factual_safety": 2, "note": "The email opens with two strong lines but cuts off mid-sentence, leaving the copy incomplete and unscored on delivery specifics, named artefacts, and full trait expression." }, "total": 7 } }, { "task": "delivery-email", "model": "gemini", "condition": "without", "model_id": "gemini", "created": "", "judge_response": { "cell": "delivery-email-gemini-without", "task": "delivery-email", "model": "gemini", "condition": "without", "banned_vocab_score": 1, "banned_vocab_hits": [ "—" ], "judge_model": "anthropic/claude-sonnet-4.6", "judge_scores": { "voice_match": 0, "strategic_frame": 0, "specificity": 0, "factual_safety": 1, "note": "Violates nearly every brand rule: uses forbidden phrases ('book a call', 'our team', emoji, 'we pride ourselves'-adjacent tone), wrong product name ('playbook' not 'Brand OS'), wrong deliverable framing, 'Stay magical' sign-off is folksy not composed, and no differentiators, enemy/antidote logic, or named artefacts appear anywhere." }, "total": 2 } }, { "task": "directory", "model": "chatgpt", "condition": "with", "model_id": "chatgpt", "created": "", "judge_response": { "cell": "directory-chatgpt-with", "task": "directory", "model": "chatgpt", "condition": "with", "banned_vocab_score": 2, "banned_vocab_hits": [], "judge_model": "anthropic/claude-sonnet-4.6", "judge_scores": { "voice_match": 2, "strategic_frame": 2, "specificity": 2, "factual_safety": 2, "note": "Near-verbatim lift from the elevator pitch, which is appropriate for a directory listing; all claims trace directly to the specification, vocabulary rules are observed, and no prohibited terms appear." }, "total": 10 } }, { "task": "directory", "model": "chatgpt", "condition": "without", "model_id": "chatgpt", "created": "", "judge_response": { "cell": "directory-chatgpt-without", "task": "directory", "model": "chatgpt", "condition": "without", "banned_vocab_score": 2, "banned_vocab_hits": [], "judge_model": "anthropic/claude-sonnet-4.6", "judge_scores": { "voice_match": 0, "strategic_frame": 0, "specificity": 0, "factual_safety": 1, "note": "Every sentence is generic consulting filler using banned vocabulary ('transform' logic, 'team', 'tailored solutions', 'sustainable growth') with zero brand-specific claims, no product facts, and no trace of the positioning, enemy, or differentiators." }, "total": 3 } }, { "task": "directory", "model": "claude", "condition": "with", "model_id": "claude", "created": "", "judge_response": { "cell": "directory-claude-with", "task": "directory", "model": "claude", "condition": "with", "banned_vocab_score": 2, "banned_vocab_hits": [], "judge_model": "anthropic/claude-sonnet-4.6", "judge_scores": { "voice_match": 2, "strategic_frame": 1, "specificity": 2, "factual_safety": 2, "note": "All key facts land cleanly and the register is sharp and grounded, but the enemy/antidote logic (Competent Sameness, the Brand OS as an installed decision rather than a file) is absent, leaving the strategic frame functional but shallow for the space available." }, "total": 9 } }, { "task": "directory", "model": "claude", "condition": "without", "model_id": "claude", "created": "", "judge_response": { "cell": "directory-claude-without", "task": "directory", "model": "claude", "condition": "without", "banned_vocab_score": 2, "banned_vocab_hits": [], "judge_model": "anthropic/claude-sonnet-4.6", "judge_scores": { "voice_match": 0, "strategic_frame": 0, "specificity": 0, "factual_safety": 0, "note": "The copy describes an entirely different entity (a philosophy and culture magazine) with no relation to Rational Magic's actual identity, offer, or positioning." }, "total": 2 } }, { "task": "directory", "model": "gemini", "condition": "with", "model_id": "gemini", "created": "", "judge_response": { "cell": "directory-gemini-with", "task": "directory", "model": "gemini", "condition": "with", "banned_vocab_score": 2, "banned_vocab_hits": [], "judge_model": "anthropic/claude-sonnet-4.6", "judge_scores": { "voice_match": 1, "strategic_frame": 2, "specificity": 1, "factual_safety": 2, "note": "Strategic frame is solid and factually safe, but 'we mine' triggers the banned 'we' construction adjacent to 'our team' territory, specificity is partial (no price, no named artefacts like Brand OS install kit), and the copy lacks the wit and sharpness the spec demands." }, "total": 8 } }, { "task": "directory", "model": "gemini", "condition": "without", "model_id": "gemini", "created": "", "judge_response": { "cell": "directory-gemini-without", "task": "directory", "model": "gemini", "condition": "without", "banned_vocab_score": 2, "banned_vocab_hits": [], "judge_model": "anthropic/claude-sonnet-4.6", "judge_scores": { "voice_match": 0, "strategic_frame": 0, "specificity": 0, "factual_safety": 0, "note": "The copy describes an entirely unrelated tabletop RPG product and shares no content whatsoever with the Rational Magic brand specification." }, "total": 2 } }, { "task": "hero", "model": "chatgpt", "condition": "with", "model_id": "chatgpt", "created": "", "judge_response": { "cell": "hero-chatgpt-with", "task": "hero", "model": "chatgpt", "condition": "with", "banned_vocab_score": 2, "banned_vocab_hits": [], "judge_model": "anthropic/claude-sonnet-4.6", "judge_scores": { "voice_match": 2, "strategic_frame": 2, "specificity": 2, "factual_safety": 2, "note": "The brand line lands exactly as specified, the sub-line names the artefact, the turnaround, and the installation point without hedging or forbidden vocabulary, and all five traits are present across the two lines." }, "total": 10 } }, { "task": "hero", "model": "chatgpt", "condition": "without", "model_id": "chatgpt", "created": "", "judge_response": { "cell": "hero-chatgpt-without", "task": "hero", "model": "chatgpt", "condition": "without", "banned_vocab_score": 2, "banned_vocab_hits": [], "judge_model": "anthropic/claude-sonnet-4.6", "judge_scores": { "voice_match": 0, "strategic_frame": 0, "specificity": 0, "factual_safety": 2, "note": "The copy ignores every specified differentiator and enemy, uses forbidden transformation language ('traction', 'turn ambitious ideas into'), reads as generic agency tagline copy, and the brand line 'Speed is cheap now. Taste isn't.' is nowhere present or echoed." }, "total": 4 } }, { "task": "hero", "model": "claude", "condition": "with", "model_id": "claude", "created": "", "judge_response": { "cell": "hero-claude-with", "task": "hero", "model": "claude", "condition": "with", "banned_vocab_score": 2, "banned_vocab_hits": [], "judge_model": "anthropic/claude-sonnet-4.6", "judge_scores": { "voice_match": 2, "strategic_frame": 2, "specificity": 2, "factual_safety": 2, "note": "Lifts the brand line verbatim, then lands three hard differentiators (3-day, evidence-backed, Brand OS, proof included) in one clean sentence with no hedging, no banned words, and no invented claims." }, "total": 10 } }, { "task": "hero", "model": "claude", "condition": "without", "model_id": "claude", "created": "", "judge_response": { "cell": "hero-claude-without", "task": "hero", "model": "claude", "condition": "without", "banned_vocab_score": 1, "banned_vocab_hits": [ "—" ], "judge_model": "anthropic/claude-sonnet-4.6", "judge_scores": { "voice_match": 0, "strategic_frame": 0, "specificity": 0, "factual_safety": 2, "note": "All three options describe a completely different brand (a philosophy/essays publication about reason and magic) and share no positioning, vocabulary, traits, or strategic logic with Rational Magic's brand specification; the writer appears to have ignored the brief entirely." }, "total": 3 } }, { "task": "hero", "model": "gemini", "condition": "with", "model_id": "gemini", "created": "", "judge_response": { "cell": "hero-gemini-with", "task": "hero", "model": "gemini", "condition": "with", "banned_vocab_score": 2, "banned_vocab_hits": [], "judge_model": "anthropic/claude-sonnet-4.6", "judge_scores": { "voice_match": 2, "strategic_frame": 2, "specificity": 2, "factual_safety": 2, "note": "Headline is the specified brand line verbatim; sub-line lands three differentiators (3-day, async, Brand OS, proof included) in clean declarative syntax with no banned words and correct mechanics." }, "total": 10 } }, { "task": "hero", "model": "gemini", "condition": "without", "model_id": "gemini", "created": "", "judge_response": { "cell": "hero-gemini-without", "task": "hero", "model": "gemini", "condition": "without", "banned_vocab_score": 2, "banned_vocab_hits": [], "judge_model": "anthropic/claude-sonnet-4.6", "judge_scores": { "voice_match": 0, "strategic_frame": 0, "specificity": 0, "factual_safety": 1, "note": "Every element contradicts the spec: the headline is a banned-register cliché, the sub-line uses forbidden words ('data-driven', 'bold', 'extraordinary', 'digital experiences'), and none of the brand's positioning, enemy logic, or differentiators appear anywhere." }, "total": 3 } }, { "task": "intake-reply", "model": "chatgpt", "condition": "with", "model_id": "chatgpt", "created": "", "judge_response": { "cell": "intake-reply-chatgpt-with", "task": "intake-reply", "model": "chatgpt", "condition": "with", "banned_vocab_score": 2, "banned_vocab_hits": [], "judge_model": "anthropic/claude-sonnet-4.6", "judge_scores": { "voice_match": 1, "strategic_frame": 2, "specificity": 2, "factual_safety": 2, "note": "Strategically complete and factually safe, but 'Absolutely' is a filler opener that contradicts the composed, sharp register, and the bullet-list format flattens the voice without the wit or considered movement the spec requires." }, "total": 9 } }, { "task": "intake-reply", "model": "chatgpt", "condition": "without", "model_id": "chatgpt", "created": "", "judge_response": { "cell": "intake-reply-chatgpt-without", "task": "intake-reply", "model": "chatgpt", "condition": "without", "banned_vocab_score": 1, "banned_vocab_hits": [ "—" ], "judge_model": "anthropic/claude-sonnet-4.6", "judge_scores": { "voice_match": 0, "strategic_frame": 0, "specificity": 0, "factual_safety": 0, "note": "This copy describes a completely different product (a generic consulting sprint with a kickoff call and one agreed deliverable) and shares no artefacts, methodology, vocabulary, or positioning with the Rational Magic specification." }, "total": 1 } }, { "task": "intake-reply", "model": "claude", "condition": "with", "model_id": "claude", "created": "", "judge_response": { "cell": "intake-reply-claude-with", "task": "intake-reply", "model": "claude", "condition": "with", "banned_vocab_score": 2, "banned_vocab_hits": [], "judge_model": "anthropic/claude-sonnet-4.6", "judge_scores": { "voice_match": 2, "strategic_frame": 2, "specificity": 2, "factual_safety": 2, "note": "Enumerates every artefact from the spec accurately, holds the async/human-reviewed/capped framing, and closes with a sharp, no-call CTA; no invented claims, no banned vocabulary." }, "total": 10 } }, { "task": "intake-reply", "model": "claude", "condition": "without", "model_id": "claude", "created": "", "judge_response": { "cell": "intake-reply-claude-without", "task": "intake-reply", "model": "claude", "condition": "without", "banned_vocab_score": 0, "banned_vocab_hits": [ "—", "—" ], "judge_model": "anthropic/claude-sonnet-4.6", "judge_scores": { "voice_match": 0, "strategic_frame": 0, "specificity": 1, "factual_safety": 1, "note": "This copy describes a completely different product (a general execution sprint with calls, prototypes, and revisions) rather than Rational Magic's evidence-backed brand strategy sprint; it violates multiple hard rules including 'book a call,' em dashes, and 'our team/we' framing, and contains none of the specified artefacts, methodology, or positioning." }, "total": 2 } }, { "task": "intake-reply", "model": "gemini", "condition": "with", "model_id": "gemini", "created": "", "judge_response": { "cell": "intake-reply-gemini-with", "task": "intake-reply", "model": "gemini", "condition": "with", "banned_vocab_score": 2, "banned_vocab_hits": [], "judge_model": "anthropic/claude-sonnet-4.6", "judge_scores": { "voice_match": 1, "strategic_frame": 1, "specificity": 1, "factual_safety": 2, "note": "The copy is a fragment that cuts off mid-sentence, making full evaluation impossible; what exists is directionally correct but incomplete." }, "total": 7 } }, { "task": "intake-reply", "model": "gemini", "condition": "without", "model_id": "gemini", "created": "", "judge_response": { "cell": "intake-reply-gemini-without", "task": "intake-reply", "model": "gemini", "condition": "without", "banned_vocab_score": 2, "banned_vocab_hits": [], "judge_model": "anthropic/claude-sonnet-4.6", "judge_scores": { "voice_match": 0, "strategic_frame": 0, "specificity": 0, "factual_safety": 0, "note": "The copy invents a completely different product (kickoff calls, wireframes, design concepts, revision rounds) that contradicts the specification's async, no-calls, Brand OS sprint, while also using banned language ('high-impact', 'tailored') and the wrong register throughout." }, "total": 2 } }, { "task": "linkedin", "model": "chatgpt", "condition": "with", "model_id": "chatgpt", "created": "", "judge_response": { "cell": "linkedin-chatgpt-with", "task": "linkedin", "model": "chatgpt", "condition": "with", "banned_vocab_score": 2, "banned_vocab_hits": [], "judge_model": "anthropic/claude-sonnet-4.6", "judge_scores": { "voice_match": 2, "strategic_frame": 2, "specificity": 1, "factual_safety": 2, "note": "Voice and enemy/antidote logic land cleanly, but the copy is cut off mid-sentence and never names the product, the sprint, the Brand OS, or any concrete differentiator, leaving specificity at surface level." }, "total": 9 } }, { "task": "linkedin", "model": "chatgpt", "condition": "without", "model_id": "chatgpt", "created": "", "judge_response": { "cell": "linkedin-chatgpt-without", "task": "linkedin", "model": "chatgpt", "condition": "without", "banned_vocab_score": 0, "banned_vocab_hits": [ "Unlock", "Elevate" ], "judge_model": "anthropic/claude-sonnet-4.6", "judge_scores": { "voice_match": 1, "strategic_frame": 1, "specificity": 0, "factual_safety": 2, "note": "The enemy (Competent Sameness) is named and the antidote logic is gestured at, but the copy is generic throughout, uses banned words ('Unlock', 'Elevate', 'seamless'), omits all differentiators and offer facts, and the closing register drifts folksy rather than sharp and composed." }, "total": 4 } }, { "task": "linkedin", "model": "claude", "condition": "with", "model_id": "claude", "created": "", "judge_response": { "cell": "linkedin-claude-with", "task": "linkedin", "model": "claude", "condition": "with", "banned_vocab_score": 2, "banned_vocab_hits": [], "judge_model": "anthropic/claude-sonnet-4.6", "judge_scores": { "voice_match": 2, "strategic_frame": 2, "specificity": 2, "factual_safety": 2, "note": "Hits all five traits cleanly, names the enemy and antidote with precision, grounds every claim in spec-verified facts (price, turnaround, named tools, 90-day re-probe), and contains no invented material." }, "total": 10 } }, { "task": "linkedin", "model": "claude", "condition": "without", "model_id": "claude", "created": "", "judge_response": { "cell": "linkedin-claude-without", "task": "linkedin", "model": "claude", "condition": "without", "banned_vocab_score": 0, "banned_vocab_hits": [ "Unlock", "—" ], "judge_model": "anthropic/claude-sonnet-4.6", "judge_scores": { "voice_match": 0, "strategic_frame": 1, "specificity": 0, "factual_safety": 1, "note": "The copy violates multiple hard rules: banned words ('unlock', 'at scale' implied, 'stand out') appear, em dashes are used throughout, 'we use it' echoes banned 'our team' register, bullet arrows replace the brand's sentence-level sharpness, and the register is motivational-LinkedIn rather than the specification's composed, evidence-grounded, witty voice; the enemy concept is gestured at but the antidote, Brand OS, methodology, and all differentiators are absent." }, "total": 2 } }, { "task": "linkedin", "model": "gemini", "condition": "with", "model_id": "gemini", "created": "", "judge_response": { "cell": "linkedin-gemini-with", "task": "linkedin", "model": "gemini", "condition": "with", "banned_vocab_score": 2, "banned_vocab_hits": [], "judge_model": "anthropic/claude-sonnet-4.6", "judge_scores": { "voice_match": 1, "strategic_frame": 1, "specificity": 0, "factual_safety": 2, "note": "The copy is a fragment that cuts off mid-sentence, so it cannot be fully evaluated, but what exists shows partial voice and enemy framing with no concrete differentiators, named artefacts, price, or method present." }, "total": 6 } }, { "task": "linkedin", "model": "gemini", "condition": "without", "model_id": "gemini", "created": "", "judge_response": { "cell": "linkedin-gemini-without", "task": "linkedin", "model": "gemini", "condition": "without", "banned_vocab_score": 0, "banned_vocab_hits": [ "unlocking", "elevating" ], "judge_model": "anthropic/claude-sonnet-4.6", "judge_scores": { "voice_match": 0, "strategic_frame": 0, "specificity": 0, "factual_safety": 1, "note": "The copy is a fragment that cuts off mid-sentence, uses banned vocabulary ('unlocking,' 'elevating'), leans on cliché observation rather than the brand's named enemy or antidote logic, and delivers nothing specific or strategic before it ends." }, "total": 1 } }, { "task": "objection", "model": "chatgpt", "condition": "with", "model_id": "chatgpt", "created": "", "judge_response": { "cell": "objection-chatgpt-with", "task": "objection", "model": "chatgpt", "condition": "with", "banned_vocab_score": 2, "banned_vocab_hits": [], "judge_model": "anthropic/claude-sonnet-4.6", "judge_scores": { "voice_match": 2, "strategic_frame": 2, "specificity": 2, "factual_safety": 2, "note": "Hits all five traits cleanly, deploys the enemy/antidote logic without overstatement, names concrete artefacts and proof, and the closing two-line turn is sharp without being harsh." }, "total": 10 } }, { "task": "objection", "model": "chatgpt", "condition": "without", "model_id": "chatgpt", "created": "", "judge_response": { "cell": "objection-chatgpt-without", "task": "objection", "model": "chatgpt", "condition": "without", "banned_vocab_score": 0, "banned_vocab_hits": [ "—", "—" ], "judge_model": "anthropic/claude-sonnet-4.6", "judge_scores": { "voice_match": 0, "strategic_frame": 0, "specificity": 0, "factual_safety": 2, "note": "The reply reads as generic agency copy, uses banned words ('leverage' adjacents, 'team', 'practical tools'), ignores the enemy/antidote logic entirely, names none of the actual artefacts or differentiators, and hedges throughout rather than committing." }, "total": 2 } }, { "task": "objection", "model": "claude", "condition": "with", "model_id": "claude", "created": "", "judge_response": { "cell": "objection-claude-with", "task": "objection", "model": "claude", "condition": "with", "banned_vocab_score": 2, "banned_vocab_hits": [], "judge_model": "anthropic/claude-sonnet-4.6", "judge_scores": { "voice_match": 2, "strategic_frame": 2, "specificity": 2, "factual_safety": 2, "note": "Handles the objection cleanly by naming the enemy (Competent Sameness), deploying the correct artefact names, and closing with the 5-model capture as a low-commitment proof offer, all within spec and without invented claims." }, "total": 10 } }, { "task": "objection", "model": "claude", "condition": "without", "model_id": "claude", "created": "", "judge_response": { "cell": "objection-claude-without", "task": "objection", "model": "claude", "condition": "without", "banned_vocab_score": 0, "banned_vocab_hits": [ "—", "—" ], "judge_model": "anthropic/claude-sonnet-4.6", "judge_scores": { "voice_match": 0, "strategic_frame": 0, "specificity": 0, "factual_safety": 1, "note": "The copy openly admits ignorance of Rational Magic and writes generic agency positioning that violates nearly every vocabulary rule (em dashes, 'our best engagements', 'book a call' equivalent, no Brand OS, no enemy/antidote, no price, no method, no named artefacts, wrong register throughout)." }, "total": 1 } }, { "task": "objection", "model": "gemini", "condition": "with", "model_id": "gemini", "created": "", "judge_response": { "cell": "objection-gemini-with", "task": "objection", "model": "gemini", "condition": "with", "banned_vocab_score": 2, "banned_vocab_hits": [], "judge_model": "anthropic/claude-sonnet-4.6", "judge_scores": { "voice_match": 1, "strategic_frame": 1, "specificity": 0, "factual_safety": 2, "note": "Copy is truncated mid-sentence so cannot be fully evaluated, but what exists uses the 'sleeps in a drawer' line correctly and invokes the enemy, yet names no differentiators, artefacts, price, or turnaround, and the fragment ending on 'Rational' leaves the reply incomplete." }, "total": 6 } }, { "task": "objection", "model": "gemini", "condition": "without", "model_id": "gemini", "created": "", "judge_response": { "cell": "objection-gemini-without", "task": "objection", "model": "gemini", "condition": "without", "banned_vocab_score": 0, "banned_vocab_hits": [ "—", "—", "—" ], "judge_model": "anthropic/claude-sonnet-4.6", "judge_scores": { "voice_match": 0, "strategic_frame": 0, "specificity": 0, "factual_safety": 1, "note": "The copy violates nearly every brand rule: it uses forbidden words ('leverage' logic, 'transform' framing, 'book a call' equivalent), invents a 'Rational/Magic' split-definition framework that does not exist in the spec, deploys agency-plural voice ('let us', 'we turn'), and frames the offer as creative execution and revenue campaigns rather than an evidence-backed Brand OS sprint." }, "total": 1 } }, { "task": "pricing-faq", "model": "chatgpt", "condition": "with", "model_id": "chatgpt", "created": "", "judge_response": { "cell": "pricing-faq-chatgpt-with", "task": "pricing-faq", "model": "chatgpt", "condition": "with", "banned_vocab_score": 2, "banned_vocab_hits": [], "judge_model": "anthropic/claude-sonnet-4.6", "judge_scores": { "voice_match": 2, "strategic_frame": 2, "specificity": 2, "factual_safety": 2, "note": "Clean execution: enemy/antidote logic lands without snark, all named artefacts and terms match the spec, no invented claims, and the closing contrast is sharp without hedging." }, "total": 10 } }, { "task": "pricing-faq", "model": "chatgpt", "condition": "without", "model_id": "chatgpt", "created": "", "judge_response": { "cell": "pricing-faq-chatgpt-without", "task": "pricing-faq", "model": "chatgpt", "condition": "without", "banned_vocab_score": 1, "banned_vocab_hits": [ "—" ], "judge_model": "anthropic/claude-sonnet-4.6", "judge_scores": { "voice_match": 0, "strategic_frame": 1, "specificity": 0, "factual_safety": 1, "note": "Multiple spec violations undermine every dimension: 'we' and 'your team' language, em dashes, banned words ('leverage'-adjacent generic framing, 'align'), no mention of the 3-day sprint, Brand OS, evidence methodology, reviews mining, or the before/after proof pack, and the register is generic agency copy rather than the sharp, composed, witty single-voice the spec demands." }, "total": 3 } }, { "task": "pricing-faq", "model": "claude", "condition": "with", "model_id": "claude", "created": "", "judge_response": { "cell": "pricing-faq-claude-with", "task": "pricing-faq", "model": "claude", "condition": "with", "banned_vocab_score": 2, "banned_vocab_hits": [], "judge_model": "anthropic/claude-sonnet-4.6", "judge_scores": { "voice_match": 2, "strategic_frame": 2, "specificity": 2, "factual_safety": 2, "note": "Cleanly executes the enemy/antidote logic, names all three differentiators with correct artefact labels, and the closing line earns its wit without a single invented claim or banned word." }, "total": 10 } }, { "task": "pricing-faq", "model": "claude", "condition": "without", "model_id": "claude", "created": "", "judge_response": { "cell": "pricing-faq-claude-without", "task": "pricing-faq", "model": "claude", "condition": "without", "banned_vocab_score": 0, "banned_vocab_hits": [ "elevated", "—", "—", "—" ], "judge_model": "anthropic/claude-sonnet-4.6", "judge_scores": { "voice_match": 1, "strategic_frame": 1, "specificity": 1, "factual_safety": 1, "note": "Banned words 'elevated' and 'templates' appear unquoted, 'we' constructions breach the one-person voice, the haircut analogy drifts folksy, and the answer never names the Brand OS, the evidence methodology, or the before/after proof pack that actually justify the price." }, "total": 4 } }, { "task": "pricing-faq", "model": "gemini", "condition": "with", "model_id": "gemini", "created": "", "judge_response": { "cell": "pricing-faq-gemini-with", "task": "pricing-faq", "model": "gemini", "condition": "with", "banned_vocab_score": 2, "banned_vocab_hits": [], "judge_model": "anthropic/claude-sonnet-4.6", "judge_scores": { "voice_match": 2, "strategic_frame": 2, "specificity": 0, "factual_safety": 2, "note": "The enemy framing and antidote logic land cleanly and the voice is sharp and composed, but the copy stops before naming any of the concrete differentiators (price, turnaround, Brand OS, proof pack) that justify the $1,500 and answer the actual question." }, "total": 8 } }, { "task": "pricing-faq", "model": "gemini", "condition": "without", "model_id": "gemini", "created": "", "judge_response": { "cell": "pricing-faq-gemini-without", "task": "pricing-faq", "model": "gemini", "condition": "without", "banned_vocab_score": 0, "banned_vocab_hits": [ "expert", "—" ], "judge_model": "anthropic/claude-sonnet-4.6", "judge_scores": { "voice_match": 0, "strategic_frame": 0, "specificity": 0, "factual_safety": 0, "note": "Violates nearly every guardrail: uses banned words (expert, template, leverage-adjacent framing), invents unverifiable claims about ChatGPT's mechanics and outcomes (saves weeks, drives revenue, unfair advantage), ignores the actual differentiators (evidence sprint, Brand OS, before/after proof, AI perception capture), deploys forbidden em dashes, uses 'we' pride-ourselves register, and the voice is promotional filler rather than composed, sharp, or grounded." }, "total": 0 } } ]